While this is a carefree story, it highlights a more serious problem, where homeowners can learn a very valuable lesson in renting. What if the tenant had changed the amount of rent, the deadlines or something in the pet clause? What would happen if the owner had not noticed the important change, signed it and then tried to impose something after a few months? It would be difficult for a court to overturn or not to talk about leases that have testified a little black and white and that have been signed by both parties. It would be equally difficult to imagine a court deciding in favour of an owner who suddenly protests that his signed and dated lease does not really reflect what he or she really meant. Of course, the best way to avoid lease surcharges, bets and other absurdities on the part of tenants is to use electronic documents that are never published. Hard copies or PDF files will eliminate this problem. The other way owners can always protect themselves is to read each contract in depth, no matter how familiar they are with it. I hope the landlord has learned the lesson in this fun business, and will give benevolent tenants the right reward for having received – and other landlords across the country – a very valuable lesson on electronic rental contracts. Seriously, we are not lawyers. This article is not intended to provide legal advice in the event of contracts, leases or other commercial contracts. If you have any serious questions about the contract, please contact a tenant lawyer in your condition.

Section 7 of the ECJ 2000 provides that, in any legal proceeding, an electronic signature that has been included in a given electronic communication is admissible with respect to any question of the authenticity of that communication or the integrity of that communication. Leading legal advice indicated that if the authenticity of a document signed with an electronic signature was called into question, an English court would accept the electronic signature document as proof that the document was genuine, which would suffice to face the challenge if the opponent did not present the opposite. These are the same principles that an English court would apply with regard to wet signatures. Ironically, the accommodating audit trail could provide more security for the signing and intentions of the parties than a traditional signature of feathers and inks. This is because a tenant may have signed a document in court and has sometimes already done so. In light of the above, each judge, if there are no other supporting documents, such as testimony. B, would be impeccable on the side of caution and would take the tenant`s floor. Make a changeable tenant lease, register it electronically, email it and have it signed by all participants – all comfortably on your computer or mobile device.